|
|
 |
|
|
| The Simpsons - An Amendment to Be |
 |
Very Funny song in"The Simpsons", Burt and
Lisa are watching on Tv this video. The
Amendment is so tender...
I hope you enjoy the Lyric
Now, all I need is a screen shot . . .
kid: Hey! Who left all this garbage on the
steps of Congress?
rolled up amendment: I'm not garbage.
(singing)
I'm an amendment to be, yes an amendment to
be,
and I'm hopin' that they'll ratify me.
There's a lot of flag burners who have got
too much freedom.
I wanna make it legal for policemen to beat
'em,
cause there's limits to our liberties.
'Least I hope and pray that there are,
cause those liberal freaks go too far.
kid: Well why can't we just make a law
against flag burning?
Amendment: Because that law would be
unconstitutional.
But if we changed the Constitution...
kid: Then we could make all sorts of crazy
laws!
Amendment: Now you're catching on!
Bart: What the hell is this?
Lisa: It's one of those campy 70's throwbacks
that appeals to Generation-X'ers.
Bart: We need another Vietnam to thin out
their ranks a little.
Kid: What if people say you're not good
enough to be in the Constitution?
Amendment (singing):
Then I'll crush all opposition to me,
and I'll make Ted Kennedy pay.
If he fights back, I'll say that he's gay.
Congressman: Good news, Amendment! They
ratified ya! You're in the U.S. Constitution.
Amendment: Oh yeah! Door's open, boys.
Tags : soundtrack simpsons lisa burt amendment Tv Usa funny video song lyric |
|
Affichage : 30932
Durée : 84 s |
| Obama And The Second Amendment |
 |
Video Script:
The right to bear arms is one of the
fundamental ideals on which our nation was
founded.
Hardworking, law-abiding Americans have for
generations enjoyed this freedom in their
communities and with their families.
But Barack Obama believes that many Americans
simply 'cling' to guns in times of economic
distress. Speaking behind closed doors to an
audience of San Francisco donors Barack Obama
said "they cling to guns or religion .... as
a way to explain their frustrations"
Obama's anti-gun record is long.
In 2004, he voted against legislation drafted
to protect homeowners from prosecution in
cases where they used a firearm to halt a
home invasion.
In 2003, he voted in support of legislation
that would have effectively banned most of
the privately held hunting shotguns, target
rifles, and black powder rifles in Illinois.
And in 1996, Obama supported a ban on the
manufacture, sale and possession of handguns.
But now Obama's running for President and
claims no knowledge of this, even though his
handwriting is all over it.
Barack Obama: Out of touch with American
values. Not ready to lead.
Tags : obama guns second amendment rnc gop nra mccain |
|
Affichage : 102223
Durée : 91 s |
| You Choose '08 Spotlight: Ron Paul on the Second Amendment |
 |
This is Day 5 of our YouChoose '08 Spotlight
week. Throughout this week we will be
featuring a new video every day of
presidential candidate Ron Paul talking about
different issues. Please submit your
questions, comments or your positions on the
issues by posting your video comments on our
video pages. (Posted August 5, 2007)
Tags : ron-paul presidential candidate |
|
Affichage : 70079
Durée : 169 s |
| 14th Amendment Citizenship: Citizen or citizen? |
 |
Prior to the alleged ratification of the 14th
Amendment, there was no legal definition of a
"citizen of the United States", as everyone
had primary citizenship in one of the several
states. The Constitution referred to the
sovereign state citizen, and no one else.
Those who went to Washington, D.C. or outside
the several states were commonly called
"citizens of the United States." In the
Constitution for the United States, the term
was used to identify state citizens who were
eligible under the suffrage laws to hold
office, and they were required under the
Constitution to have primary allegiance to
one of the several states.
Since that term was not specifically defined
in the U.S. Constitution, Congress in 1868
took advantage of this term and utilized it
in the so-called 14th Amendment to describe a
NEW type of "citizen" whose primary
allegiance was to the federal government,
i.e. Washington, D.C. and not to one of the
several states of the union. Thus, using the
term as used in the U.S. Constitution to
mislead and confuse the people as to the true
intent and meaning of the Constitution.
Many people have mistaken the citizen as
denominated in the 14th Amendment to mean the
same one in the original constitution, this
is in error. The "citizen of the united
states" as used in the constitution is not
the same as the citizen of the United States
used after the 14th Amendment. So all the
elected officials are NOT sitting in the
office constitutionally, they are merely
impostors created by the 14th Amendment. The
current President Clinton, is a U.S. citizen,
and therefore not the "citizen of the united
states" defined in the Constitution for the
United States, neither the federal senators
nor any congressmen are seated
constitutionally. These facts being true,
then all the federal laws are invalid for
want of constitutionality.
The 14th Amendment creates and defines
citizenship of the United States. It had long
been contended, and had been held by many
learned authorities, and had never been
judicially decided to the contrary, that
there was no such thing as a citizen of the
United States, except by first becoming a
citizen of some state. United States v.
Anthony (1874), 24 Fed. Cas. 829 (No.
14,459), 830.
We have in our political system a government
of the United States and a government of each
of the several states. Each one of these
governments is distinct from the others, and
each has citizens of its own who owe it
allegiance, and whose rights, within its
jurisdiction, it must protect. The same
person may be at the same time a citizen of
the United States and a citizen of a state,
but his rights of citizenship under one of
these governments will be different from
those he has under the other. U. S. v.
Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).
In other words, you do not have to be a
citizen of the United States in order to be a
state citizen. This was held to be true by
the Maryland Supreme Court in 1966 wherein
the state:
Both before and after the Fourteenth
Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has
not been necessary for a person to be a
citizen of the United States in order to be a
citizen of his state. Crosse v. Bd. of
Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966)
The federal government was never given any
authority to encroach upon the private
affairs of the citizens in the several states
of the union, unless they were involved in
import or export activity, neither were they
given authority to reach a citizen of Germany
living in Germany. In fact, the states could
refuse to enforce any act of congress, that
they felt was outside the intent of the
granting of limited powers to the federal
government. This is called interposition or
nullification. Several state supreme courts
have in the past refused to uphold federal
laws within their states.
- Richard McDonald's state Citizen
http://political-resources.com/jurisdiction/c
itizen.htm
Tags : state sovereign two classes citizen 14th Amendment slavery united nations new one world order government fascism fraud |
|
Affichage : 9135
Durée : 588 s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
