|
|
 |
|
|
| Obama Tampering with the 13th Ammendment now!! |
 |
Does Forced Volunteerism Contribute To the
'Slave' Mentality?
Barack Obama gave a speech on July 2, 2008 on
"A New Era of Service" where he said he would
set a goal for students to perform a certain
amount of "service" a year and that he would
attach strings to educational monies to
assure they did so.
Jonah Goldberg, writing an editorial for the
LA Times has taken issue with Barack Obama's
speech to which Obama said he would "set a
goal for all American middle and high school
students to perform 50 hours of service a
year, and for all college students to perform
100 hours of service a year."
Obama went on to say he would attach strings
to educational dollars to see to it those
goals were met.
Goldberg goes on to quote from the 13th
amendment which says, "Neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime where of the party shall have been
duly convicted, shall exist within the United
States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction."
Goldberg doesn't let John McCain off the hook
either as he points out that John McCain and
President Bush both are in favor of
"Washington-led (and paid-for)
"volunteerism."
He also points out that both Christopher J.
Dodd and John Edwards used compulsory service
in their campaign platforms.
In pointing out the data and statistics of
Americans that willingly give their time and
money, he says:
Americans are vastly more generous with their
time and their money than Europeans.
According to social demographer Arthur C.
Brooks, in 1995 (the last year international
comparative data on giving was available),
Americans gave 3 1/2 times as much money to
charities and causes as the French, seven
times more than the Germans and 14 times more
than the Italians.
In 1998, Americans also volunteered 21% more
than the Swiss and 32% more than Germans --
two countries with compulsory national
service. And yet we're continually told we
should emulate them so that America too can
have a "culture of service."
Goldberg readily admits that national service
is not slavery but he contends that
compulsory national service contributes to
the "slave mentality".
There's a weird irony at work when Sen.
Barack Obama, the black presidential
candidate who will allegedly scrub the stain
of racism from the nation, vows to run afoul
of the constitutional amendment that
abolished slavery.
Is Goldberg right that forcing people to
volunteer by threatening the funding of their
education is contradictory to the literal
definition of the word "volunteer"?
1. a person who voluntarily offers himself or
herself for a service or undertaking.
2. a person who performs a service willingly
and without pay.
Is making service compulsory, for a nation
that already gives more time and money, run
the risk of going against the 13th amendment?
Tags : Slavery 13th ammendment us constitution Obama is puke |
|
Affichage : 2999
Durée : 193 s |
| Cops Steal Journalists Camera 1st & 4th Ammendment Violations |
 |
I was attacked by the New York Police
Department, who broke my camera AND stole
it... as well as my footage.
DOWNLOAD A FULLSCREEN VERSION FROM MY WEBSITE
http://Fluxview.com
For an example of good cop behavior check out
this video from the 4th annaul Iraq War
Protest in LA. You will see a squad of bike
and foot cops ORDERED to march into the
center of a permitted anti war demonstration
during a punk concert. They create a line
seperating the crowd. Tensions mount (no
shit). Finally a cop with some authority on
the ground say's "Why are we doing this?"
Since none of the ranking officers on the
ground have any idea why they were ordered
into the crowd... they leave. That's a good
cop. The one that says "why are we doing
this" when ordered to do fucked up shit.
watch it.
http://fluxview.com/v/protests/04/M20LA/QT-Ma
rch20th-Antagonistas.htm
Tags : Police Brutality cops journalism freedom NYPD NYC fascism |
|
Affichage : 246374
Durée : 359 s |
| 2nd Ammendment under attack?? |
 |
DC v Heller, Parker Vs District of Columbia
is a good thing, it will put to rest the 2nd
ammendment arguments that have gone on for
decades. Remember, we have to review U.S. Vs.
Miller to understand it and go back to the
ratification of the 14th ammendment, if you
dont understand all three, you dont
understand the argument.
Tags : 2nd second ammendment supreme court d.c. dc appeals lewismadmax |
|
Affichage : 1004
Durée : 307 s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
