| WMD LIES - Bush Cheney Rumsfeld etc. - THE ULTIMATE CLIP |
 |
+++FORWARD THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW -
NOW!!!+++
This, my friends, is the ultimate clip
regarding WMD lies - the clip we have all
been waiting for. All the lies of George W.
Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld,
Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell compiled
together, brilliantly done, with some great
"extra" material.
+++This clip is now also online with Spanish
subtitles - spread the message!! LINK:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Am0vKUJy9U
+++Background music: THE KILLERS: ALL THE
THINGS THAT I HAVE DONE+++
___
ATTENTION: A shortened version without
swearwords is now online - so that you can
post this clip in forums in which swearwords
are not allowed:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0L5ZQ1usR-w
___
Thanks a lot to my friend Sally from
California for bringing this clip to my
attention!
Make sure that at the next elections this
bunch of liars gets thrown out of the White
House - forever and ever.
This clip was created by:
http://www.puppetgov.com
---
By the way: In this scene when Cheney says
"it's pretty well confirmed that he did go to
Prague and met with Iraqi officials", Cheney
was referring to Mohammed Atta.
---
+++STAND UP, WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY
MORE!!!+++
NOTE: You have watched this clip, and you are
STILL not convinced that Bush did anything
wrong? Then you should read about the already
infamous, top-secret "DOWNING STREET MEMO" -
exposing that the West knew very well that
Saddam was NOT a threat and that the war was
ILLEGAL.
Links:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/arti
cle387374.ece
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_m
emo
Excerpt from the Downing Street Memo (about
the Cabinet meeting on 23rd July 2002):
"(...)C reported on his recent talks in
Washington. There was a perceptible shift in
attitude. Military action was now seen as
inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam,
through military action, justified by the
conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the
intelligence and facts were being fixed
around the policy. The NSC had no patience
with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for
publishing material on the Iraqi regime's
record. There was little discussion in
Washington of the aftermath after military
action.(...)
It seemed clear that Bush had made up his
mind to take military action, even if the
timing was not yet decided. But the case was
thin. Saddam was not threatening his
neighbours, and his WMD capability was less
than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We
should work up a plan for an ultimatum to
Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons
inspectors. This would also help with the
legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for
regime change was not a legal base for
military action. There were three possible
legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian
intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The
first and second could not be the base in
this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three
years ago would be difficult. The situation
might of course change."
+++UPDATE+++
Here is another link proving the lies:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sidney_bl
umenthal/2007/09/turning_truth_into_lies.html
Tags : lies wmd george bush dick cheney donald rumsfeld rice wolfowitz rove powell impeach iraq war cia intelligence kucinich barack obama sarah palin |
|
Affichage : 264817
Durée : 386 s |
| Bush / Cheney to Attempt Possible Coup |
 |
Bush signs unconstitutional "power grab"
presidential directives NSPD51 and HSPD20,
giving him full-dictatorial powers in the
event of a loosely defined "catastrophic
emergency."
_______________________________
The directives define "catastrophic
emergency" as "any incident, regardless of
location, that results in extraordinary
levels of mass casualties, damage, or
disruption severely affecting the U.S.
population, infrastructure, environment,
economy, or government function."
It also states, "The President shall lead the
activities of the Federal Government for
ensuring constitutional government." In other
words, the president gave himself the sole
power and duty to interpret the constitution
anyway he chooses, and neither Congress nor
the public shall be allowed to debate or
disagree on such matters.
Right now, the only thing standing between
the United States' Constitutional Republic
and Bush/Cheney's apparent desire to rule
with an iron fist is a lesser event than that
of 9/11.
_______________________________
Tags : right left wing fox bush cheney neocon nspd51 nspd 51 hspd20 nwo iraq oprah jessica alba iran nau iphone simpsons cspan |
|
Affichage : 129352
Durée : 626 s |
| Arrest Warrant for Bush/Cheney |
 |
READ FULL TEXT OF WARRANT HERE...
On June 16th during operation "Shock and Awe
on the Oregon Coast",, members of
SQUADRON13-DEPLOYED recorded this arrest
warrant for Bush and Cheney at City Hall in
Newport Oregon.
[Text of arrest warrant]
As former members of the armed services of
the United States of America, we swore to
support and defend the Constitution of the
United States against all enemies, foreign
and domestic. Upon discharge from service we
did not renounce that oath, which remains our
sacred duty.
It has long been apparent to us that our
Constitution is under attack and has been
deliberately and relentlessly undermined by
domestic enemies -- indeed, by our highest
government officials who took and have
violated that same oath.
Many Constitutional crimes have been
committed by the Bush administration,
including warrantless electronic surveillance
of American citizens in violation of the 4th
Amendment, failure to provide due process
rights in violation of the 5th and 6th
Amendments, infliction of cruel and unusual
punishments in violation of the 8th
Amendment, usurpation of powers granted
exclusively to Congress in violation of
Article I, Section 1, and violation of
Article VI, Paragraph 2, which states that
all international treaties to which the
United States is a signatory are "the Supreme
law of the Land."
The wars prosecuted by the Bush
administration in our name with our national
resources are violations of all treaties
defining the international laws of war since
1928, including the United Nations and
Nuremberg charters, which uniformly prohibit
wars of aggression. As violations of these
international covenants and pledges, they
also constitute high crimes against the
United States Constitution.
Furthermore, the illegal occupations of Iraq
and Afghanistan and other war crimes
including torture and use of internationally
prohibited weapons such as depleted uranium,
violate the Geneva Conventions of 1949,
thereby further violating the Supreme Law of
our Land.
Our oath therefore compels us to issue a
citizens' warrant for the immediate arrest of
George W. Bush and Richard Cheney, President
and Vice-President of the United States.
We call upon President Bush and
Vice-President Cheney to surrender themselves
to federal law enforcement authorities or to
any private group of Americans that is
prepared to make these citizens arrests.
The right of citizens arrest is deeply
grounded in English common law and is
constitutionally protected under the 9th
Amendment, derived from the natural right of
self-defense and defense of others. A
citizens arrest is valid when arresting
citizens have a reasonable belief that the
suspect has committed a felony.
We believe that felonies of great magnitude
have been committed, and the evidentiary
bases of these are conclusively established
in the public record.
We charge these officials with conspiracy to
commit genocide against the citizens of
another sovereign state, with conspiracy to
commit mass murder of American citizens by
waging a fraudulently justified war, and
other high crimes described on our website,
www.VeteransAgainstTorture.com.
Our charges include war crimes and crimes
against humanity for which we will seek
extradition for trial in the international
criminal court at the Hague, Netherlands,
following trial in the United States for
treason and other high crimes against our
constitutional government.
Source: http://www.VeteransAgainstTorture.com
and http://www.Squadron13.com
Tags : arrest warrant bush cheney illegal war crimes |
|
Affichage : 21713
Durée : 212 s |
| Olbermann: Bush, Cheney should resign |
 |
'I didn't vote for him, but he's my
president, and I hope he does a good job.'
SPECIAL COMMENT
By Keith Olbermann
Anchor, 'Countdown'
MSNBC
Updated: 5:13 p.m. PT July 3, 2007
"I didn't vote for him," an American once
said, "But he's my president, and I hope he
does a good job."
That—on this eve of the 4th of July—is
the essence of this democracy, in 17 words.
And that is what President Bush threw away
yesterday in commuting the sentence of Lewis
"Scooter" Libby.
The man who said those 17 words—improbably
enough—was the actor John Wayne. And
Wayne, an ultra-conservative, said them, when
he learned of the hair's-breadth election of
John F. Kennedy instead of his personal
favorite, Richard Nixon in 1960.
"I didn't vote for him but he's my president,
and I hope he does a good job."
The sentiment was doubtlessly expressed
earlier, but there is something especially
appropriate about hearing it, now, in Wayne's
voice: The crisp matter-of-fact
acknowledgement that we have survived, even
though for nearly two centuries now, our
Commander-in-Chief has also served,
simultaneously, as the head of one political
party and often the scourge of all others.
We as citizens must, at some point, ignore a
president's partisanship. Not that we may
prosper as a nation, not that we may achieve,
not that we may lead the world—but merely
that we may function.
But just as essential to the seventeen words
of John Wayne, is an implicit trust—a
sacred trust: That the president for whom so
many did not vote, can in turn suspend his
political self long enough, and for matters
imperative enough, to conduct himself solely
for the benefit of the entire Republic.
Our generation's willingness to state "we
didn't vote for him, but he's our president,
and we hope he does a good job," was tested
in the crucible of history, and earlier than
most.
And in circumstances more tragic and
threatening. And we did that with which
history tasked us.
We enveloped our President in 2001.And those
who did not believe he should have been
elected—indeed those who did not believe he
had been elected—willingly lowered their
voices and assented to the sacred oath of
non-partisanship.
And George W. Bush took our assent, and
re-configured it, and honed it, and shaped it
to a razor-sharp point and stabbed this
nation in the back with it.
Were there any remaining lingering doubt
otherwise, or any remaining lingering hope,
it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the
prison sentence of one of his own staffers.
Did so even before the appeals process was
complete; did so without as much as a
courtesy consultation with the Department of
Justice; did so despite what James
Madison—at the Constitutional
Convention—said about impeaching any
president who pardoned or sheltered those who
had committed crimes "advised by" that
president; did so without the slightest
concern that even the most detached of
citizens must look at the chain of events and
wonder: To what degree was Mr. Libby told:
break the law however you wish—the
President will keep you out of prison?
In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that
fundamental com-pact between yourself and the
majority of this nation's citizens—the ones
who did not cast votes for you. In that
moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the
President of the United States. In that
moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the
President of a rabid and irresponsible corner
of the Republican Party. And this is too
important a time, Sir, to have a
commander-in-chief who puts party over
nation.
This has been, of course, the gathering
legacy of this Administration. Few of its
decisions have escaped the stain of politics.
The extraordinary Karl Rove has spoken of "a
permanent Republican majority," as if such a
thing—or a permanent Democratic
majority—is not antithetical to that upon
which rests: our country, our history, our
revolution, our freedoms.
Yet our Democracy has survived shrewder men
than Karl Rove. And it has survived the
frequent stain of politics upon the fabric of
government. But this administration, with
ever-increasing insistence and almost
theocratic zealotry, has turned that stain
into a massive oil spill.
The protection of the environment is turned
over to those of one political party, who
will financially benefit from the rape of the
environment. The protections of the
Constitution are turned over to those of one
political party, who believe those
protections unnecessary and extravagant and
quaint.
The enforcement of the laws is turned over to
those of one political party, who will swear
beforehand that they will not enforce those
laws. The choice between war and peace is
turned over to those of one political party,
who stand to gain vast wealth by ensuring
that there is never peace, but only war.
And now, when just one cooked book gets
corrected by an honest auditor, when just one
trampling of the inherent and inviolable
fairness of government is rejected by an
impartial judge, when just one wild-eyed
partisan is stopped by the figure of blind
justice, this President decides that he, and
not the law, must prevail.
I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country
into war.
I accuse you of fabricating in the minds of
your own people, a false implied link between
Saddam Hussein and 9/11.
I accuse you of firing the generals who told
you that the plans for Iraq were disastrously
insufficient.
I accuse you of causing in Iraq the needless
deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons, and
sisters and daughters, and friends and
neighbors.
I accuse you of subverting the Constitution,
not in some misguided but sincerely-motivated
struggle to combat terrorists, but to stifle
dissent.
I accuse you of fomenting fear among your own
people, of creating the very terror you claim
to have fought.
I accuse you of exploiting that unreasoning
fear, the natural fear of your own people who
just want to live their lives in peace, as a
political tool to slander your critics and
libel your opponents.
I accuse you of handing part of this Republic
over to a Vice President who is without
conscience, and letting him run roughshod
over it.
And I accuse you now, Mr. Bush, of giving,
through that Vice President, carte blanche to
Mr. Libby, to help defame Ambassador Joseph
Wilson by any means necessary, to lie to
Grand Juries and Special Counsel and before a
court, in order to protect the mechanisms and
particulars of that defamation, with your
guarantee that Libby would never see prison,
and, in so doing, as Ambassador Wilson
himself phrased it here last night, of
becoming an accessory to the obstruction of
justice.
When President Nixon ordered the firing of
the Watergate special prosecutor Archibald
Cox during the infamous "Saturday Night
Massacre" on October 20th, 1973, Cox
initially responded tersely, and ominously.
"Whether ours shall be a government of laws
and not of men, is now for Congress, and
ultimately, the American people."
President Nixon did not understand how he had
crystallized the issue of Watergate for the
American people.
It had been about the obscure meaning behind
an attempt to break in to a rival party's
headquarters; and the labyrinthine effort to
cover-up that break-in and the related
crimes.
And in one night, Nixon transformed it.
Watergate—instantaneously—became a
simpler issue: a President overruling the
inexorable march of the law of insisting—in
a way that resonated viscerally with millions
who had not previously understood - that he
was the law.
Not the Constitution. Not the Congress. Not
the Courts. Just him.
Just - Mr. Bush - as you did, yesterday.
The twists and turns of Plame-Gate, of your
precise and intricate lies that sent us into
this bottomless pit of Iraq; your lies upon
the lies to discredit Joe Wilson; your lies
upon the lies upon the lies to throw the sand
at the "referee" of Prosecutor Fitzgerald's
analogy. These are complex and often painful
to follow, and too much, perhaps, for the
average citizen.
But when other citizens render a verdict
against your man, Mr. Bush—and then you
spit in the faces of those jurors and that
judge and the judges who were yet to hear the
appeal—the average citizen understands
that, Sir.
It's the fixed ballgame and the rigged casino
and the pre-arranged lottery all rolled into
one—and it stinks. And they know it.
Nixon's mistake, the last and most fatal of
them, the firing of Archibald Cox, was enough
to cost him the presidency. And in the end,
even Richard Nixon could say he could not put
this nation through an impeachment.
It was far too late for it to matter then,
but as the decades unfold, that single final
gesture of non-partisanship, of acknowledged
responsibility not to self, not to party, not
to "base," but to country, echoes loudly into
history. Even Richard Nixon knew it was time
to resign
Would that you could say that, Mr. Bush. And
that you could say it for Mr. Cheney. You
both crossed the Rubicon yesterday. Which one
of you chose the route, no longer matters.
Which is the ventriloquist, and which the
dummy, is irrelevant.
But that you have twisted the machinery of
government into nothing more than a tawdry
machine of politics, is the only fact that
remains relevant.
It is nearly July 4th, Mr. Bush, the
commemoration of the moment we Americans
decided that rather than live under a King
who made up the laws, or erased them, or
ignored them—or commuted the sentences of
those rightly convicted under them—we would
force our independence, and regain our sacred
freedoms.
We of this time—and our leaders in
Congress, of both parties—must now live up
to those standards which echo through our
history: Pressure, negotiate, impeach—get
you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who
are now perilous to our Democracy, away from
its helm.
For you, Mr. Bush, and for Mr. Cheney, there
is a lesser task. You need merely achieve a
very low threshold indeed. Display just that
iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon
showed, on August 9th, 1974.
Resign.
And give us someone—anyone—about whom all
of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne,
and say, "I didn't vote for him, but he's my
president, and I hope he does a good job."
Tags : Olbermann Bush Nixon Cheney Lewis "Scooter" Libby Wilson Archibald Cox Plame Fitzgerald Plame-Gate |
|
Affichage : 51326
Durée : 607 s |
| LIES LIES LIES - WMD - Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice lying! |
 |
UPDATE+++NEW CLIP+++PLEASE WATCH:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EYI7JXGqd0o
+++FORWARD THIS CLIP TO EVERYBODY YOU KNOW+++
Do you think that this is an "old" story? Not
relevant any more? Then watch George W. Bush
and his glorious team lying like professional
crooks and think again...they are still
there, just Rummy had to go...the others are
not better than him, and they have blood on
their hands. Lots of blood.
NOTE: You have watched this clip, and you are
STILL not convinced that Bush did anything
wrong? Then you should read about the already
infamous, top-secret "DOWNING STREET MEMO" -
exposing that the West knew very well that
Saddam was NOT a threat and that the war was
ILLEGAL.
Links:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_...
Excerpt from the Downing Street Memo (about
the British Cabinet meeting on 23rd July
2002):
"(...)C reported on his recent talks in
Washington. There was a perceptible shift in
attitude. Military action was now seen as
inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam,
through military action, justified by the
conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the
intelligence and facts were being fixed
around the policy. The NSC had no patience
with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for
publishing material on the Iraqi regime's
record. There was little discussion in
Washington of the aftermath after military
action.(...)
"It seemed clear that Bush had made up his
mind to take military action, even if the
timing was not yet decided. But the case was
thin. Saddam was not threatening his
neighbours, and his WMD capability was less
than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We
should work up a plan for an ultimatum to
Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons
inspectors. This would also help with the
legal justification for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for
regime change was not a legal base for
military action. There were three possible
legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian
intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The
first and second could not be the base in
this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three
years ago would be difficult. The situation
might of course change.(...)"
Made by Eric Blumrich.
www.ericblumrich.com
+++UPDATE+++
Here is another link proving the lies:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sidney_bl
umenthal/2007/09/turning_truth_into_lies.html
Tags : president bush administration cheney rumsfeld rice wmd iraq war weapons mass destruction lies chemical saddam hussein |
|
Affichage : 66679
Durée : 208 s |
|
|
|
|
|
