|
|
 |
|
|
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processor |
 |
Visit http://tiger.tv/more_info/?516 for more
information. With four execution cores, the
Intel Core 2 Quad processor blows through
processor-intensive tasks in demanding
multitasking environments and makes the most
of highly threaded applications. Whether
you're creating multimedia, annihilating your
gaming enemies, or running compute-intensive
applications at one time, new quad-core
processing will change the way you do
everything. The unprecedented performance of
the Intel Core 2 Quad processor is made
possible by each of the four complete
execution cores delivering the full power of
Intel Core microarchitecture. More
instructions can be carried out per clock
cycle, shorter and wider pipelines execute
commands more quickly, and improved bus lanes
move data throughout the system faster. This
quad-core processor represents Intel's
continued leadership and drive of multi-core
processing and more parallel computing.
Tags : Intel Core Quad Q6600 Processor CPU Duo Kentsfield computertv |
|
Affichage : 104937
Durée : 347 s |
| Cuisinart Mini-Prep Plus 3-Cup Food Processor - Item:... |
 |
Food preparation just got easier! Created by
Cuisinart, one of the leading names in
kitchen appliances, this 3-cup processor is
compact, fast and efficient. The
auto-reversing SmartPower Blade features a
chop and grind touchpad control that lets you
chop or grind ingredients instantly at the
touch of a button. Other fantastic features
include: 3-cup transparent bowl with handle -
tackle everyday cooking tasks with ease.
Makes it easy to move contents from the bowl
to a pot, pan or other container Auto-reverse
SmartPower blade Spatula and
recipe/instruction book Dishwasher-safe parts
- makes clean-up fast and easy White base -
blends easily into virtually any kitchen
decor Stainless steel blade with...
Tags : entertainment cuisinart mini prep plus cup |
|
Affichage : 8467
Durée : 430 s |
| Intel tests chip design with 80-core processor |
 |
Following their march from standard
processors to dual-core and quad-core designs
in 2006, Intel Corp. researchers have built
an 80-core chip that performs more than a
trillion floating-point operations per second
(TFLOPS) while using less electricity than a
modern desktop PC chip.
First described by Intel executives at a
September trade show, the chip fits 80 cores
onto a 275-square-millimeter, fingernail-size
chip and draws only 62 watts of power -- less
than many modern desktop chips.
Tags : intel processor chip |
|
Affichage : 32166
Durée : 122 s |
| macro processor |
 |
Sorry. I left my headset plugged in, so the
audio on the camera did not work.
However I don't want to remove this post
because I got an encouraging comment from a
viewer.
--------------------
I take a "devil's advocate" position, and
assume that there is no difference between
macro processing and language processing - in
the sense that macro processors and language
processors are universal Turing machines, and
can be provided with arbitrarily easy to use
user interfaces.
This term has been used at least since 1965,
when Strachey published details of his GP/M
macroprocessor in Computer Journal.
A simple example of its use would be to
convert the Cobol statement "ADD A TO B" to
the Fortran statement "B = B + A".
Is there any difference between a "macro
processor" and a "language interpreter"? Just
as any computer language has general
computational power, so does any macro
language (or at least we can add commands to
it if necessary, until this point is
reached).
It is said that the C preprocessor has the
power of a universal Turing machine. But this
will be of little value to people unless it
provides an easy to use interface. A device
can be a universal Turing machine without
providing an attractive user interface,
because it may be too expensive (in today's
computer costs) to provide an attractive user
interface. Some Turing machines would take
the age of the universe to carry out a simple
computation - presumably we might get a
result like this if we tried to build a user
interface using (only) the C preprocessor.
The Forth language was originally implemented
in Fortran. It allows the user to add
commands to the language interactively.
The Unix command line encourages people to
write little programs, and then use them to
build other programs, using facilities such
as piping.
What kinds of languages can we invent? How
much can we do with simple languages based on
English?
Forth and Lisp both look to be a long way
from standard English.
Is it possible, at last, to use standard
English as a computer programming language?
Given an English sentence, we can break this
up into "kernel sentences".
Someone in the 1960's suggested using natural
language as a specification, and converting
this to an implementation in 5 steps.
Presumably, we can use natural language for
specifying all the intermediate steps. For
the final step, we can write "kernel
sentences" which we already know will be
understood by the system. So it seems that
natural language can be used at every step,
as the only language we need to use - given
that we have worked out already how to
convert "kernel sentences" to a computer
implementation.
Unix achieved its fame from allowing the user
to specify multiple tasks. This was promoted,
around the same time, by Brinch Hansen with
Concurrent Pascal. Languages such as PL/I,
and Burroughs languages, already provided
this feature.
Has anyone written a macro processor which
provides a "multi tasking" feature? We could
implement template matching by using
multi-tasking, with "daemons" for each
template watching for their occurrence, as in
a blackboard system.
But is this the full story? Is there a way
that we want the macroprocessor to be able to
run other tasks. For example, by running
other tasks, we can build a machine running
exponential numbers of tasks.
Last year I heard of Peter Wegner's work in
the late 1990's, when he said there was a new
computing paradigm of interaction rather than
computation. I did not agree with him - the
machinery for interaction has been well known
since Dikstra, "Cooperating Sequential
Processes", 1965 - Simula was also invented
in the 1960's. However, I now concede that
progress has been slow in writing software
this way. Certainly Unix is a very good
example, as is the Unisys A series computer.
If anything Wegner says encourages people to
write software as interacting agents, then I
applaud wholeheartedly.
Tags : macro processor |
|
Affichage : 786
Durée : 342 s |
| Cell Processor Ray-tracing |
 |
This video shows a progression of ray-traced
shaders executing on a cluster of IBM QS20
Cell blades. The model comprises over 300,000
triangles and renders at over 60 frames per
second, depending on the shader, at 1080p
resolution using 14 Cell processors. Because
of the scalable nature of the ray-tracer it
can also render interactive frames on a
single Linux Playstation3 using only 6 SPEs.
Download raytracer at:
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/irt
Tags : Cell Ray-tracing rendering PS3 graphics IBM Sony Playstation3 |
|
Affichage : 102350
Durée : 39 s |
| Lecture - 5 ARM Processor |
 |
Lecture series on Embedded Systems by
Dr.Santanu Chaudhury,Dept. of Electrical
Engineering, IIT Delhi . For more details on
NPTEL visit http://nptel.iitm.ac.in
Tags : ARM Processor |
|
Affichage : 7095
Durée : 3337 s |
| game cube - Nintendo Wii processor |
 |
Video footage of IBM manufacturing the
Nintendo Wii Microprocessor.
original movie url
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/attachment/
20213.wss?fileId=ATTACH_FILE1
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressreleas
e/20213.wss
Tags : powerpc game cube |
|
Affichage : 26840
Durée : 237 s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
